This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN

From: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:51:33 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
References: <20120528134625.GD3030@redhat.com><CADZpyiwEKd+PDAFoWaYZHyUA+Naq6ui0mT-EgyrN2sUyhDJnpw@mail.gmail.com><20120528163436.GE3030@redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1205281639470.357@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:40:33PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I think it's better to put this sort of thing in libm-test.inc instead of 
> creating ad hoc tests for things that libm-test.inc is able to cover.

True.  This will be covered by changes to libm-test.inc here
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2012-05/msg01856.html
once it gets in (without the #ifndef TEST_LDOUBLE guard).

	Marek

References:
- [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
  - From: Marek Polacek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
  - From: Marek Polacek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]