This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: RFA: Port maintainers: Convert WORDSIZE[32|64]/ld to abi-variants
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Adhemerval Zanella
<azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 09:59 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Andreas Krebbel
>> <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> On 05/30/2012 02:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers
>>>> <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I restored sh and sparc entries in shlib-versions on hjl/abi branch.
>>>>>> The new patch is at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=patch;h=0d1f492b3cf83a200601c1f49734b048c5547e57
>>>>> Provided the new version passes architecture maintainer testing I think it
>>>>> will probably be OK for 2.16, given the comments Roland requested saying
>>>>> that the use of soname variables set in makefiles is wrong and a bug filed
>>>>> with a 2.17 milestone to get this cleaned up properly along the lines I
>>>>> proposed (naming ABI variants, not triplets, in shlib-versions, with all
>>>>> the architecture information in shlib-versions moving to appropriate
>>>>> sysdeps directories shared by all the ABI variants of each architecture).
>>>>>
>>>> I rebased hjl/abi branch. ?Has anyone verified it on sparc, powerpc an s390x?
>>> I've tested your patch on s390 and s390x. No regressions.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>>
>>> -Andreas-
>>>
>> Adhemerval,
>>
>> Can you test hjl/abi branch on powerpc?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>
> Yes, I have tested and got expected make check failures, so it is ok.
>
I will rebase and merge hjl/abi branch with master.
Thanks.
--
H.J.