This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Use x86-64 bits/byteswap.h for both i386 and x86_64

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: PATCH: Use x86-64 bits/byteswap.h for both i386 and x86_64
References: <20120530201222.GA22141@intel.com> <20120530203038.3BF6B2C0A2@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOqnsMBMnXeTSRpHH1YYkGZDhnKAqVvKWBkeTQWra7GxZg@mail.gmail.com><20120530205348.E748D2C0A9@topped-with-meat.com>

On Wed, 30 May 2012, Roland McGrath wrote:

> > x86_64/bits/byteswap.h is i386-compatible.  There is nothing to do.
> 
> I see.  I misread your message then.  Using git diff -M for patches that
> do file renames makes it much more clear when a rename is verbatim,
> and that would have prevented my misunderstanding.
> 
> So now I think this change is fine.  But I'd like Joseph to sign off too.

I agree this change is fine.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- PATCH: Use x86-64 bits/byteswap.h for both i386 and x86_64
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Use x86-64 bits/byteswap.h for both i386 and x86_64
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PATCH: Use x86-64 bits/byteswap.h for both i386 and x86_64
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Use x86-64 bits/byteswap.h for both i386 and x86_64
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]