This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] AArch64 glibc port


On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> (2) Split up your patches.
> 
> One huge patch is impossible to review.
> 
> I can see about 25-30 groupings of files that relate and your patch should
> be split up along those lines.

No, absolutely do not split it up artificially.  Patch submissions should 
be self-contained.  The port (the new sysdeps files) should be submitted 
as a single patch, to libc-ports only (not libc-alpha), with appropriate 
rationale for any design choices it seems appropriate to draw attention 
to.  One patch is much easier to review, and spot whether anything is 
missing in it, than 25-30.

The only things to split up are any libc changes required (generally, 
anything outside of ports/sysdeps/.../aarch64/), where each logical change 
should be sent in its own self-contained patch submission with its own 
self-contained rationale.

(If any bits of the port are *not needed at all* for a functional port - 
if they are purely optimized functions - they can be omitted from the 
submission and dealt with later afer the port is in.  But still don't send 
multiple ports patches in the initial submission.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]