This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [2.16] [PATCH] Skip audit if l_reloc_result is NULL

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:51:52 -0500
Subject: Re: [2.16] [PATCH] Skip audit if l_reloc_result is NULL
References: <20121127010428.GA13163@intel.com><CAE2sS1g1v3e3EsQgmR3zTd1_rsiejmFaH7BnJu5bYTP_16G5HQ@mail.gmail.com><CAMe9rOonDrWX-5tSaT=oF6LtHz=E2ZvveeKfBjvsnujdCBdYpw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This looks good to me for 2.16. Please notify the m68k and sh
>> maintainers directly to get them to assist with the backport to 2.16.
>>
>> One nit...
>>
>>
>> This is the wrong BZ#.
>>
>
> Fixed and pushed into release/2.16/master branch.  I am enclosing
> one backport for m68k and one for sh.  OK to 2.16?

These look good to me.

Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.16] [PATCH] Skip audit if l_reloc_result is NULL
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [2.16] [PATCH] Skip audit if l_reloc_result is NULL
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [2.16] [PATCH] Skip audit if l_reloc_result is NULL
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [2.16] [PATCH] Skip audit if l_reloc_result is NULL
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]