This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sunday 02 December 2012 17:10:40 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 November 2012 23:10:20 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> The __builtin_bswap* functions were introduced in gcc-4.3, not gcc-4.2. > >> Fix the __GNUC_PREREQ tests to reflect this. > >> > >> Otherwise trying to compile code with gcc-4.2 falls down: > >> In file included from /usr/include/endian.h:60, > >> from /usr/include/ctype.h:40, > >> /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h: In function 'unsigned int > >> __bswap_32(unsigned int)': /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h:46: error: > >> '__builtin_bswap32' was not declared in this scope > >> /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h: In function 'long long unsigned int > >> __bswap_64(long long unsigned int)': > >> /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h:110: error: '__builtin_bswap64' was not > >> declared in this scope > > > > btw, i think this should go into 2.17 (and perhaps the 2.16 branch) since > > this is a regression from 2.15. > > How did you confirm this? Exactly what GCC 4.2 did you use? I'm > without access to my machines right now, or I'd test this. compiling gcc-4.2 fails which is why i noticed ;) compiling gcc-4.1 & gcc-4.3 works gcc manual agrees with me: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcc/Other-Builtins.html <- bswap at bottom of page http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.0/gcc/Other-Builtins.html <- no bswap -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |