This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 05/15] Add hle.h base header


On 01/10/2013 05:58 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> In several other projects right now I've used an opcode compatability
>> layer, just like Andi is, so that features can be compiled in that
>> binutils does not support yet.
>>
>> And it is an entirely reasonable thing to do.
> 
> It is a reasonable thing to do when there is good reason to worry about
> people building with older tools and needing the new code.  This is not
> such a case.
 
Are you assuming that downstream distributions would ensure that 
gcc/binutils would have HLE support before building a glibc that
needs it rather than use a opcode compat layer like hle.h?

I would agree with that assumption.

The addition of hle.h seems more to allow developers to play with
HLE without needing to upgrade their tools; useful, but only for
the small subset that are doing that and not for the project as a
whole.

Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]