This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't bind to registered ports in bindresvport
- From: Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net>
- To: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- Cc: Dan Nicholson <dbn dot lists at gmail dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>,Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>,libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:55:38 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't bind to registered ports in bindresvport
- References: <20120531153241.GA21672@buster.dwcab.com><CADZpyiyzShWCe1OgA0b+vZW6NQGT0Q9WUK4=jev5MRu7pUxKtQ@mail.gmail.com><20120601200113.GA24584@buster.dwcab.com><CADZpyizNLJkWKZKPhmb1GRZr33jsBR8wMkwE8EnN3nU8Mu_0cw@mail.gmail.com><20120604152538.GA13202@buster.dwcab.com><4FCE5688.9060700@redhat.com><CAMs08DKeaCEhW7OdUag3YN6+9nP45=8aZjWnOBYs0NCf5rKCcg@mail.gmail.com><20130112173711.GA7387@buster.dwcab.com><87pq0ql7b9.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 09:06:18PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> There's a patch for another blacklist file,
> /etc/bindresvport.blacklist, which we use in Debian, but it does not
> work for some reason:
>
> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687210>
Followed up to that bug, FWIW. Doesn't look like a bug in our local
patch (though, it would be lovely if it weren't local at all), from
a quick test here.
... Adam