This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC] signal-safe fprintf?
On 7 March 2013 18:09, Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> wrote:
> This is not a problem for the proposed usage, where the same FILE
> would not be used in both places (one of the FILEs would be a
> temp/dummy one created in snprintf). My only concern is whether
> snprintf and dprintf add their dummy FILE to the global open file
> list, which also involves locking. I seem to remember at least dprintf
> doing this, but I may be mistaken..
Yes, just that even if we come up with such a function, it will only
be useful for this specific use case and nothing else. I'm not sure
if that is useful enough.
--
http://siddhesh.in