This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC 2.0] Implementing hwcap2


On 2013-03-28 14:21, Ryan S. Arnold wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
On 03/28/2013 10:52 AM, Ryan Arnold wrote:
+++ b/sysdeps/s390/s390-32/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@

  #include <unistd.h>
  #include <dl-procinfo.h>
+#include <stdint.h>

  #define STFLE_BITS_Z10  34 /* General instructions extension */
  #define STFLE_BITS_Z196 45 /* Distinct operands, pop ... */
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@
    extern void *FUNC##_z10 attribute_hidden;                          \
    extern void *FUNC##_g5 attribute_hidden;                           \
                                                                       \
-  void *resolve_##FUNC (unsigned long int dl_hwcap)                  \
+  void *resolve_##FUNC (uint64_t dl_hwcap)                           \

This is an abi change for 32-bit big-endian systems.

A uint64_t hwcap is already the default storage type for hwcap for all
architectures.

From ldsodefs.h:

   /* Mask for hardware capabilities that are available.  */
   EXTERN uint64_t _dl_hwcap;

Am I not understanding what you mean by 'abi change'?  Can you throw
me a bone and describe a problematic use case where my suggestion
breaks something?

Given "unsigned long int" = 32-bit and big-endian, e.g s390, then
currently the parameter is r2 = low(_dl_hwcap).

With your change, r2 = high(_dl_hwcap), r3 = low(_dl_hwcap).

You could preserve compatibility by changing the signature
to pass 32 bits per unsigned long argument, in an enforced
little-endian order.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]