This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:43:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <51948AF9 dot 7020702 at suse dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305161257580 dot 9498 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 05/16/2013 03:14 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
My impression is that we have a couple of patches that get pinged but it's not
such a large number that we need an automated tool and something low tech like
a wiki page would be a good start - and it would tell us more about the size
of the problem.
Looking just at <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-05/threads.html>
I see patches/pings from this month arguably pending review:
Thanks for the list, this is worse than I thought,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126