This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:31:01 -0300
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <51948AF9 dot 7020702 at suse dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305161257580 dot 9498 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305162206040 dot 1874 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAAKybw--qcKAnHWA1uWtcL0RGqHP4R+XqgPHt98yR-s4UEZQWQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 16-05-2013 20:08, Ryan S. Arnold wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> And looking at April for pending patches, there are some more cases
>> although they are a bit less clear:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00680.html (multiarch
>> support for PPC32) - not specifically proposed for 2.18, but it's
>> unfortunate there have been no comments at all.
> I think we're going to wait until 2.19 for this one as we'd like to
> put in powerpc64 support at the same time.
>
> Ryan
>
I need to push some missing ppc32 cleanups and also the string part for ppc64. I
also intend to start post libc-alpha patch after 2.18 release.