This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Update bits/siginfo.h with Linux hwpoison SIGBUS changes


Always write 'short int', never just 'short'.  Otherwise these seem fine to
me (assuming they match the new kernel definitions).  

The ports changes technically need pro forma sign-off from four
maintainers.  But I think it's good enough if you've triple-checked that
the new definitions match the kernel's for each machine, and wait a few
days to give them a chance to speak up, but go ahead and commit (say, on
Tuesday) for each port whose maintainer hasn't responded.  You can commit
the common change now (and each port's change as soon as the maintainer
says), or wait to do them all together, at your pleasure.


Thanks,
Roland


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]