This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Update on freeze status of glibc 2.18?
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Ryan Arnold <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Update on freeze status of glibc 2.18?
- References: <51B65DE4 dot 4010107 at redhat dot com> <20130610231903 dot D9C602C09B at topped-with-meat dot com> <51B66222 dot 1040300 at redhat dot com>
> I will assume that you would not be opposed to a configure
> switch that turns elision on or off with the default being
> elision off, but no questionable env vars to tune behaviour.
Probably not, if the code enabled by the configure switch does not
diverge from the API and ABI guarantees we already make and does not
include anything generally ugly that we wouldn't want in the tree at all.