This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.24 -- Cutting the branch and my FSF steward position on __malloc_initialize_hook.

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Cc: Sinny Kumari <skumari at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:33:40 +0200
Subject: Re: glibc 2.24 -- Cutting the branch and my FSF steward position on __malloc_initialize_hook.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <ffa777c0-6df9-54e6-4972-422c5535f44f@redhat.com> <9d015dbf-8a89-49f1-1a1e-06cba4ad344e@redhat.com>

On 08/01/2016 05:37 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

On 08/01/2016 11:22 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

Adhemerval,

As an FSF steward my position is that we should _not_ revert the
__malloc_initialize_hook changes, and that we should cut the branch today.


I see I missed the fact that:

* malloc: Remove malloc_get_state, malloc_set_state

Remains on the blocker list.

I think this needs to be deferred to 2.25 at the open of the branch.


Yes, I don't expect this to go in at this point.

Thanks,
Florian

References:
- glibc 2.24 -- Cutting the branch and my FSF steward position on __malloc_initialize_hook.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.24 -- Cutting the branch and my FSF steward position on __malloc_initialize_hook.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]