This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Re: --disable-static on ELF fails
Re: /usr/include/scsi
Re: 2.0.102-2.0.104 diffs
2.0.103 building problems
Re: 2.0.104
Re: 2.0.104 on sparc
2.0.104 success, x86 and sun4c
Re: 2.1.102 patch is broken :/
2.1.104
Re: <err.h> comments incorrect
Re: <signal.h> broken with _POSIX_SOURCE=1 defined
[50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)]
[bwelling@anomaly.munge.com] libc/872: possibly incorrect pselect() definition
Re: [danyd@fastrac.net.au] libc/846: struct ip_fw mismatch between netinet/ip_fw.h and linux/ip_fw.h
Re: [dpb@infoseek.com] libc/855: calloc returns non-zeroed memory
Re: [glibcbug] test_time.c failed check
Re: [john@math.nwu.edu] libc/863: Tzset returns EST even if TZ=CST6CDT (also with on TZ in central tz)
Re: [Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>] libc/858: Missing ethertype.h and ETHERTYPE_* defines
Re: [wtjones@widowmaker.com] libc/836: There appears to be a bug in the sigmask handling in Linuxthreads.
Re: _cleanup
Re: alpha problems with 2.0.104 and egcs 1.1
Another libio bug.
Another missing prototype: inet6_isipv4mapped
Re: bincompat problem with 2.0.102 (StarOffice 5)
binutils 2.9.1.0.16 is released.
Re: Bug in stdio.h optimizations
Re: Bug in sysdeps/generic/bits/byteswap.h
re: bug report on coshf(+infinity) = 0
Re: Bugfix
Re: built .mo files
Re: Cleanup of bits/utmpx.h
Re: configure reports msgfmt as too old...
corrupted file pwd/fgetpwent.c
Re: crashing problem with ld and -O1
current glibc 2.1 cvs doesn't build
Re: CVS build failure
Re: Damaged PPC_REL24 handling
Re: dl test program segfaults
Re: don't install <bits/libc-lock.h>
Re: An exec and signal bug
Experimental common-symbols patch
Re: Failed compile with glibc-2.0.103
Re: Failing tests in glibc
Re: floating point in startup code
Re: gdb 4.17 & glibc-2.0.104
gdb 4.17.0.5 is released.
glibc 2.0.101
glibc 2.0.102
Re: glibc 2.0.103
Re: Glibc on ppc built on i386
glibc-2.0.100
Re: glibc-2.0.100: bits/string2.h nits
Re: glibc-2.0.104
Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems
Re: glibc-2.0.99: accidental l10n of info files
Re: globbing functions in glibc-2.0.102 broken?
Re: go for 2.1
if_packet
Interaction bug between egcs snapshots, glibc, and 2.0 kernels
Re: isastream
Re: libc-2.0.7 compiled programs segfault with 2.0.102 in _IO_old_file_close_it
Re: libc-internal thread-specific data revamp
Re: libc/836: There appears to be a bug in the sigmask handling in Linuxthreads.
Re: linux & /proc
Re: linuxconf complexity
linuxconf problems
long double prototypes
Re: making info bug
Re: malloc has a problem probably in glibc-2.0.96
Re: Misc patches for glibc
A miscompiled glibc 2.1?
Re: more on StarOffice
Re: My list of bugs I'd like to see fixed before 2.1
new LinuxThreads add-on
No Subject
Re: NR_OPEN and POSIX test
Re: NTP dumps Linux, film at 11. [Fwd/FYI]
Re: NTP dumps Linux, film at 11. [Fwd/FYI]
one more change
Re: A patch for comment
A patch for libio
Re: A patch for mktime.c and tz*.c.
Re: A patch for nanosleep
Re: A patch for PIC default
A patch for typo
Re: patch to clean up generic signum.h
permission changes in glibc CVS archive
Re: PF_NETLINK support in glibc
Re: PIC default check
pine4.05 and glibc-2.0.104: no member f_basetype in struct statvfs
Re: Problem on linux/alpha
Re: Problems building for ARM
Re: A prototype patch
Re: Question about gdb
Re: Question about gdb (fwd)
Re: A revised time patch (fwd)
RTLD_GLOBAL problem
Re: Rules
Re: segfault with ncftp 3.0b15
Re: semun union
Re: setresgid,setresuid: Prototypes missing
Re: signum
Re: sleep ignore sigchld
Re: sleep ignore sigchld (fwd)
Re: Small patch to sysdeps/generic/bits/types.h
Re: StarOffice 5.0 problems
subdir dependencies
sysdep/unix/sysv/linux/configure
Re: termios.h
test it
Re: Unprotected extern inline function __cmsg_nxthdr
Updated version of new libc testsuite is available
Re: va_dcl
Re: versioned symbols question
Re: Warnings in <bits/string.h>
Re: Why put this patch?
Re: Why this change?
Re: xbl-1.0h-3.src.rpm
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
MHonArc
2.3.3