This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: A patch for glibc 2.0/2.1
- To: hjl@lucon.org
- Subject: Re: A patch for glibc 2.0/2.1
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:00:10 +1100
- CC: kettenis@phys.uva.nl, libc-hacker@cygnus.com
- References: <m103noL-00038dC@ocean.lucon.org>
> From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:08:13 -0800 (PST)
> Cc: libc-hacker@cygnus.com
> We don't want to be flooded with ANY glibc bug reports
> associated with gcc. That is why I suggest we require egcs for
> compiling glibc 2.1.
Then shouldn't we require a specific version of egcs?
I don't see why being "flooded with glibc bug reports associated with
gcc" is a problem. Simply forward them to the gcc maintainers, if
they are a gcc problem, or fix them if not.
--
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>