This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> Mark Kettenis writes: Mark> From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> Mark> Date: 30 Nov 1999 14:57:23 +0100 Mark> - Mark and Roland, ldconfig is now also build for the Hurd. Is this Mark> ok? Mark> Probably not. The first line of sysdeps/mach/hurd/dl-cache.c says: Mark> Stubby version of dl-cache; the Hurd doesn't support this "feature". Mark> I tend to agree. Even under Linux I don't use ldconfig. Mark> Ultimately, on a correctly configured Hurd all shared libraries will appear Mark> under /lib by using nifty Hurdish features. Mark> Anyway, unless Roland and/or Thomas change their mind, ldconfig is Mark> useless on the Hurd, so it would be better if you could arrange things Mark> such that ldconfig is only built and installed for Linux. We've got two options: Build it only for Linux - or don't build it on Hurd. Since (quoting another email from you) "It's just the Hurd that wants to be different :-)." what's the right way to go? Btw. anybody with a hint how to do this? Setting a make variable that's disabled/enabled for Hurd/Linux? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |