This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 05:35:01PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > With the current glibc 2.2, I received the following error message: > /opt/egcs1.1.2/bin/gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/elf/librtld.os '-Wl,-(' /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/elf/dl-allobjs.os /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/libc_pic.a -lgcc '-Wl,-)' > /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/libc_pic.a(init-first.os): In function `init': > /libc-dl-wip/csu/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/init-first.c:61: multiple definition of `__libc_multiple_libcs' > /build-glibc-dl-wip/20000110/elf/dl-allobjs.os(.data+0xe4):/libc-dl-wip/elf/rtld.c: first defined here > > Why do we have in sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c: > int __libc_multiple_libcs = 0; /* Defining this here avoids the inclusion > of init-first. */ > > and also in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/init-first.c: > /* Set nonzero if we have to be prepared for more then one libc being > used in the process. Safe assumption if initializer never runs. */ > int __libc_multiple_libcs = 1; > > and why is this a problem on Linux/MIPS and not on Linux/ix86? I'm a > little bit confused and appreciate your help. > > Is this a bug in binutils? On Linux/MIPS I use: > $ ld --version > GNU ld 2.9.5 Is this vanilla 2.9.5 or the one from oss.sgi.com with my patches applied? I remember having fixed various bugs like this but it's too long since then, forgot all the details. Ralf
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |