This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Scott Bambrough <scottb@netwinder.org> writes: |> Thorsten Kukuk wrote: |> > |> > I have append a patch to make sys/io.h (2.1.3 and 2.2) for i386 |> > C++ safe. |> > |> |> This fix is fine, but I don't believe it should be necessary. The C++ parsing |> routines should recognize they are in an inline assembler construct and act |> accordingly. IMHO, this is a compiler bug. No, in C++ `::' is a separate token, that is different from `: :'. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |