This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes: > Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: >> I'm appending the conform test data for <arpa/inet.h>. > Darn. I started making all the changes since I thought you wouldn't do it. Sorry, I've been a bit busy the last week and I waited for an answer from you before. But I'm now checking your changes and send some more patches. I'm also going to work on limits.h-data the coming week. >> <arpa/inet.h> is part of the current Austin-Draft. What kind of test >> macro should be used to mark this? > Normally I use __USE_UNIX2K for these things (until something is > final). But in the case where a header is newly introduced no feature > test macro is needed. You misunderstood me - what's used for conformdata? You missed to remove YESEXPR and NOEXPR from langinfo.h-data. They should be surrounded by the equivalent for conformdata of __USE_UNIX2K: #ifndef __USE_UNIX2K # define YESEXPR # define NOEXPR #endif Btw. shouldn't we remove ndbm.h-data since we removed the db support? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |