This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 03:46:40PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote: > > > glibc 2.2 is ok. The problem is the existing glibc 2.1 systems. The > > binaries created by the new linker under glibc 2.1 may not run due > > to those new dtags. I just sent in a new patch which turns off the > > new dtag by default so that the linker can create the working binaries > > under glibc 2.1. > > OK. That makes sense. > > Ideally, you would want to only add the new tags when they make a > difference to how the executable should be treated. I don't know what > the new tags do so I don't know if this is possible. For the most parts, the new tags replace the old ones with a little twist. They come from the new gABI. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |