This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
This is hardly a complete benchmark, but here goes: inlined: $ /usr/bin/time string/inl-tester >/dev/null 0.77user 0.00system 0:00.77elapsed 100%CPU $ /usr/bin/time string/inl-tester >/dev/null 0.77user 0.00system 0:00.77elapsed 100%CPU $ /usr/bin/time string/inl-tester >/dev/null 0.77user 0.00system 0:00.77elapsed 100%CPU non-inlined: $ /usr/bin/time string/noinl-tester >/dev/null 0.74user 0.00system 0:00.74elapsed 99%CPU $ /usr/bin/time string/noinl-tester >/dev/null 0.74user 0.00system 0:00.74elapsed 99%CPU $ /usr/bin/time string/noinl-tester >/dev/null 0.74user 0.01system 0:00.74elapsed 101%CPU The non-inlined version is 4% faster Does anyone have more comprehensive benchmarks that justify string inlines for ix86? Does anyone know how i[345]86 perform in this regard? Greg
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |