This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 03:02:16PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes: > > > Since testing for existence of function may cause exceptions, I clear > > all exceptions in init_max_error. Or we can modify all those functions > > to set and check errno for ENOSYS before continue. > > I've added this patch as well. Thanks, > Thanks. Now "make check" passes on ia64. The only remaining issuses are 2000-09-29 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/sysdep.S (__ia64_syscall): Removed. I believe the kernel <asm/unistd.h> should only export the system call numbers to the user space and the user programs should use syscall (__NR_xxx, .....) In anycase, glibc 2.2 doesn't export __ia64_syscall. We should fix it one way or the other. I prefer to fix the user programs. 2000-08-27 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/clone.S: Make it dummy. No need for it. Ulrich, I believe the consensus is to remove clone for ia64. Thanks. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |