This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: > On both my P3 and my Athlon with both gcc 2.95.2 and gcc from CVS, I > got some problems libm-test after the constants have been changed to > long double. > > I've committed the appended patch, I prefer to not have this. I have a PIII as well and don't see any problems. So this must be a compiler issue. If gcc 2.95 generates wrong code it cannot be used. If (what is more likely) it generates code which causes the loss of precision the C code must be made more stable so that a different compiler makes no difference. Please undo the patch and look at the code difference between 2.95 and what ever other gcc version. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |