This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes: > Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: > > > Here's a patch - ok to commit? > > I think it was intentional that we didn't add some of the long double > functions for Alpha. Ideally none would have been added. At some > point we want to be able to add 128-bit long double. So, by > "accidently" leaving out some long double functions maybe we can carry > the message to not use long double on Alpha. It's not only Alpha - it's all platforms that don't have long double, e.g. also Sparc. I'd argue to add the functions since they're part of ISO C99. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |