This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: Add __frame_state_for for gcc 3.0.1

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add __frame_state_for for gcc 3.0.1
From: Roland McGrath <roland at gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 06:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>

> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/Makefile (sysdep_routines): Add
> 	frame-dwarf2 for elf if $(build-shared) and $(need-frame-dwarf2)
> 	are both yes.
> 	(shared-only-routines): Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/Makefile: Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/Makefile: Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/Makefile: Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/Makefile: Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/Makefile: Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/Makefile: Likewise.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/Makefile: Likewise.

Are these changes in fact linux-specific?  Shouldn't the support be
included any time elf && build-shared && need-frame-dwarf2,
perhaps controlled (for future platforms) by something like SHLIB_COMPAT?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Add __frame_state_for for gcc 3.0.1
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]