This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Even with using -j$numprocs in make install_locales it takes very very long > time to build all the locales (well, without -j$numprocs it takes longer > than to build whole glibc), but the vast majority of LC_COLLATE and That is why I added it :-). > LC_CTYPE files is identical. localedef will hardlink them together, but > after the costly computation; I believe LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE take far > most of the time. > E.g. I have 116 identical *.utf8/LC_CTYPE files and 79 *.utf8/LC_COLLATE > files. > I wonder, wouldn't it make sense to add some special option to localedef, > with which user could specify a cache file. make install_locales would I also tried to modify localedef to take a list of locales from a file and generate those data in one run. It should be much faster. But I couldn't figure out a way to release all the memory held by the locale stuff in glibc. I finally gave up on that. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |