This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[PATCH] Don't define SHN_UNDEF twice

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:39:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Don't define SHN_UNDEF twice
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

Hi!

I don't think we need to define SHN_UNDEF twice...
$ grep SHN_UNDEF elf.h
#define SHN_UNDEF       0               /* Undefined section */
#define SHN_UNDEF       0               /* No section, undefined symbol.  */

2002-01-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* elf/elf.h (SHN_UNDEF): Remove duplicate definition.

--- libc/elf/elf.h.jj	Wed Jan  9 13:54:01 2002
+++ libc/elf/elf.h	Wed Jan  9 13:55:29 2002
@@ -415,10 +415,6 @@ typedef struct
 #define SYMINFO_NUM		2
 
 
-/* Special section index.  */
-
-#define SHN_UNDEF	0		/* No section, undefined symbol.  */
-
 /* How to extract and insert information held in the st_info field.  */
 
 #define ELF32_ST_BIND(val)		(((unsigned char) (val)) >> 4)

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Don't define SHN_UNDEF twice
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]