This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> What do you need __frame_state_for for on s390x? I though we need it for the transition from gcc 2.95.x to gcc 3.x. > Is that architecture supported by gcc 2.95.2? > Even if yes, if this wasn't needed on s390x so far, I don't think it should > be added. There has been an internal version 2.95.2 of gcc but that never saw the light of day. The only version that is used at the moment is 2.95.3. So basically you are saying that we do NOT need __frame_state_for to get from gcc 2.95.3 to gcc 3.x, correct ? blue skies, Martin Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247 E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |