This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: nanosleep in locarchive

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 14 May 2002 15:37:01 -0700
Subject: Re: nanosleep in locarchive
References: <20020512221059.4861F1BA17@perdition.linnaean.org>

On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 15:10, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Any objection to this change?  (On Hurd we have usleep but not nanosleep.
> This call doesn't need the finer granularity.)

This is true t I'd really like to avoid using any but the POSIX
interfaces.  Are there any problems with implementing nanosleep for
Hurd?  The precision does not have to be nanoseconds.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nanosleep in locarchive
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- nanosleep in locarchive
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]