This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: nix INTUSE?

From: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: nix INTUSE?

> We cannot entirely get rid of it.  There are several places where we 
> define special *_internal symbols.

I'm not following you.  If something is entirely internal, we just declare
it with attribute_hidden and that's all that's needed.  If something is
exported, then we can use libc_hidden_proto.

> If you want to convert some cases feel free but I'd say there are more 
> important thangs to do.

Well, sure.  I am just trying to verify that my thinking is correct.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nix INTUSE?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- Re: nix INTUSE?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]