This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> IMHO this is a defect in the standard, because "integer" can mean >> anything from char to long long and whatever extended integer type might >> be defined. It does not restrict the arguments to type "int". > > I tend to agree. We use long for that reason. It's the most useful > interpretation of "integer". That interpretation of long causes problems for x86-64 since ints are not sign extented when passed in varargs... So, what can I do? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |