This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The problem is not loss of optimization. The semantics f code gets changed. And incorrectly so. gcc cannot inline a non-static function unless its visibility != default. It might be possible to add a gcc option to signal that all functions can be assumed to be non-preemptible.If -O3 could inline only static or explicit inline routines, it would be far less useful than it currently is (for the applications which benefit from automatic inlining, of course, the majority does not).
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |