This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Nuke another 21 .plt slots


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jakub Jelinek wrote:

If -O3 could inline only static or explicit inline routines, it would
be far less useful than it currently is (for the applications which benefit
from automatic inlining, of course, the majority does not).
The problem is not loss of optimization. The semantics f code gets changed. And incorrectly so. gcc cannot inline a non-static function unless its visibility != default. It might be possible to add a gcc option to signal that all functions can be assumed to be non-preemptible.

- -- - ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9T28s2ijCOnn/RHQRAvVsAJ0T3Y7mxqpqNxVndZWjPCZ+hkrSXQCeP9AK
18XrDpDvZ8qqVTAew4Y1cSs=
=7nCZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]