This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

dl_dynamic_weak

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:27:21 +0100
Subject: dl_dynamic_weak
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

Hi!

Now that also linuxthreads works with dl_dynamic_weak = 0,
I wonder if linuxthreads just should define RTLD_CORRECT_DYNAMIC_WEAK
or whether the conditional should be killed, ie. whether
there are some thread implementations other than ntpl and linuxthreads
which depend on dl_dynamic_weak = 1 (Hurd cthreads?).

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dl_dynamic_weak
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]