This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:27:57 +0100
Subject: Re: Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3
References: <m3fzrg7n53.fsf@whitebox.local><200301272216.40142@enzo.bigblue.local>

Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:

|> On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:47, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > +compat_symbol (libc, __umoddi3, __umoddi3, GLIBC_2_0);
|> 
|> Shouldn't that be GLIBC_2.0 (. not _)?

No, this must be a valid identifier, which is translated via
abi-versions.h into the actual version (which might not be GLIBC_2.0 after
all).  It's a wrapper around symbol_version.

|> I also wonder why you didn't wrap it with a SHLIB_COMPAT?

I'm not sure whether it is needed.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]