This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes: |> > Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes: |> > |> > |> On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:47, Andreas Schwab wrote: |> > |> > +compat_symbol (libc, __umoddi3, __umoddi3, GLIBC_2_0); |> > |> |> > |> Shouldn't that be GLIBC_2.0 (. not _)? |> > |> > No, this must be a valid identifier, which is translated via |> > abi-versions.h into the actual version (which might not be GLIBC_2.0 after |> > all). It's a wrapper around symbol_version. |> > |> > |> I also wonder why you didn't wrap it with a SHLIB_COMPAT? |> > |> > I'm not sure whether it is needed. |> |> If you don't use SHLIB_COMPAT, you will compile in unexported dead code on |> a configuration that doesn't need to support GLIBC_2.0. These functions will never be dead, since they are used by glibc itself. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |