This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:07:11 -0800, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said: Uli> LinuxThreads for x86 is meant for compatibility and adding something Uli> like this which isn't very often just doesn't seem necessary. If you Uli> have a new kernel you want to run a decent thread library. Sure, I'd love to. I thought the ia64 NPTL bits weren't quite ready yet. But yes, it will be nice to have it. Uli> There is no fundamental problem but it might just open another Uli> can of worms (i.e., it needs testing). I can see that, but unless I'm missing something, the sysinfo member is always there in the thread descriptor. Leaving it uninitialized seems more dangerous than initializing it with a sane value, no? --david
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |