This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>,libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:31:39 +0100
Subject: Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
References: <OF9CBA7AC0.4231C01A-ONC1256CC3.005200FF@de.ibm.com><jehebkkr9v.fsf@sykes.suse.de><20030204162120.Q17910@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

|> I don't think TLS changes anything here. What exact gcc and binutils are
|> you using is more interesting. Perhaps a configure test could be written
|> for that.

I've used gcc 3.3-CVS, binutils 2.13.90.0.18.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky
- Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]