This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com> writes: > I think things have stablelized now and we can think about 2.3.2. Do > all architectures which worked in 2.3.1 work now? Are any other > architectures which didn't work in 2.3.1 close to working with the > current tree? x86-64 works and passes the complete testsuite with the exception of the linuxthreads/ex18 problem that I mentioned on libc-alpha. But this didn't work in 2.3.1 either, so we're as good as before - and in most areas we're better ;-). So, feel free to go ahead. A prerelease might be a good idea, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de private aj at arthur dot inka dot de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |