This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Is anyone else seeing make check failures in tst-nanosleep and tst-clock_nanosleep? I see these fail at various times (7.5%+ failure rate) on PPC64 (both 2.4 and 2.5) kernels running either PPC32 or PPC64 applications. These are all SMP machines. In each case the measured time averages 0.5 jiffies less than 1 second! The nanosleep code is in the kernel is arch independent so I would expect this test to fail on the SMP platforms?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |