This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
[Ulrich Drepper] > Not until the problem is figured out. The test fails for me, several > lines are in a different order after the test. Oh. It worked for me when I sent the patch a long time ago. I'll look into why it fail. Do you have any more details? Perhaps I forgot to remove my patch to get the sorting order test to check _all_ characters in the file, and not ignore "\s+[:(;].*$" when testing the sorting order of locales. That is the only related change I can think of, even though I'm pretty sure I tested the patch on a clean CVS tree.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |