This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: what are __ieee754_exp2l/__ieee754_log2l for?

David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes:

> On a completely unrelated note, can somebody tell me what the routines
> mentioned in $SUBJECT are for?  What are they're supposed to do and
> what are they needed for?

They are the core of the C99 exp2l and log2l functions, resp.  Nobody has
yet written generic implementations of them for 80-bit extended float.
Currently only x86, m68k and x86-64 specific versions exist, and a 128-bit
extended float version of log2l.  Search for e_exp2l.* and e_log2l.* in
the sysdeps hierarchy for the existing implementations.

> I'm asking since on ia64 "make check" keeps failing with:
>
> __ieee754_exp2l not implemented
> __ieee754_log2l not implemented

It's not failing because of this.  When a math funtion is not implemented
it is just skipped by the tests.  Actually, all math tests are working
fine here.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]