This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:28:43PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:05:40 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> said: > > Roland> If you want to keep track of something, use bugzilla. > > I see somebody already created a bugzilla bug-report for this issue: > > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=461 > > May I ask why it is taking so long (almost two months already) to get > such a seemingly simple patches into glibc? Is there something > controversial in the patch? I am afraid that there is another gcc bug which has to be fixed first: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18153 My patch is still waiting for review. Otherwise, many DSOs from glibc will depend on libunwind.so.7 which isn't used at all. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |