This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: Whats up with _POSIX_CPUTIME

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: Steve Munroe <sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com>, libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com, dgm69 at us dot ibm dot com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:20:17 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Whats up with _POSIX_CPUTIME
References: <20041201104155.GL8259@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <200412012000.iB1K06bt004818@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:00:06PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Did you just mean the s/#if #defined/#if defined/ in posix/tst-regex2.c?
> > That's the only thing I found during testing...
> 
> That's the only thing I noticed, but it indicated the patch wasn't tested.
> 
> I don't like the __HAVE_CPUTIME stuff.  Already on ia64 it is a runtime
> determination if the clocks are available.  

So should I redo that just to call __sysconf (_SC_{THREAD_,}CPUTIME)?

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Whats up with _POSIX_CPUTIME
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Whats up with _POSIX_CPUTIME
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Whats up with _POSIX_CPUTIME
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]