This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fixes for make clean (take 2)

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:04:45 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes for make clean (take 2)
References: <m3sm5ibwe5.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20050107124425.GB17169@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <m3brc12veq.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20050108163855.GD17169@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <m3zmzjx3vw.fsf@gromit.moeb>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 05:49:23PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > This seems to work for me:
> 
> But why is it necessary?  Why are we using both
> tests: $(objpfx)some-test.out
> and
> tests += other-test
> 
> Only the later should be needed AFAIK,

tst-pie1 needs a special rule, because the general rule for building
tests is unsuitable for building PIE binaries.
If you have the special rule and tests += tst-pie1, then you get the
make warnings about overriding targets.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fixes for make clean (take 2)
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- Fixes for make clean
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Fixes for make clean
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Fixes for make clean
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- [PATCH] Fixes for make clean (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fixes for make clean (take 2)
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]