This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 05:49:23PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> > This seems to work for me: >> >> But why is it necessary? Why are we using both >> tests: $(objpfx)some-test.out >> and >> tests += other-test >> >> Only the later should be needed AFAIK, > > tst-pie1 needs a special rule, because the general rule for building > tests is unsuitable for building PIE binaries. Yeah - a special rule not only for execution but also for building. Now I see... > If you have the special rule and tests += tst-pie1, then you get the > make warnings about overriding targets. Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |