This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix LD_BIND_NOT and LD_PROFILE on ia64

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes at sunsite dot dk>, libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:24:47 +0100
Subject: Re: Fix LD_BIND_NOT and LD_PROFILE on ia64
References: <jer7kfrqzy.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <41F328E6.1090807@redhat.com>

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> This patch fixes PR677.
>
> It might have fixed it at some point in time.

And still does!

>  But it does not even apply today anymore.  Why do you send something as
> outdated as this?

??? It perfectly matches what is on the 2.3 branch!  Why don't you just check
the PR and look at the version field???

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix LD_BIND_NOT and LD_PROFILE on ia64
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- Fix LD_BIND_NOT and LD_PROFILE on ia64
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Fix LD_BIND_NOT and LD_PROFILE on ia64
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]