This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I still see these warnings and would like to help getting them fixed.
Richard, what do you suggest is the best thing to do?
Andreas
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> Let's look closer at one example:
> ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_isinf.c:29: warning: âisinfâ aliased to undefined symbol â__isinfâ
>
> The function is:
>
> int
> __isinf (double x)
> {
> int32_t hx,lx;
> EXTRACT_WORDS(hx,lx,x);
> lx |= (hx & 0x7fffffff) ^ 0x7ff00000;
> lx |= -lx;
> return ~(lx >> 31) & (hx >> 30);
> }
> hidden_def (__isinf)
> weak_alias (__isinf, isinf)
>
> And the warning appears for the weak_alias. If I change it to:
> weak_alias (__GI___isinf, isinf)
>
> Everything is fine.
>
> so, is this the right way to do - and should we add a new macro, e.g.
> hidden_weak_alias to use in place of weak_alias above?
>
> Or how should this be solved to make GCC happy - and be convenienent
> for glibc?
>
> Andreas
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |