This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > The following patch shouldn't result in worse code generation (not > even with -O0 I believe) with -DNDEBUG, should quiet that warning > and also allow some checking of expr. With -DNDEBUG assert will > happily accept even syntax errors within its arguments etc., which > would only show up without -DNDEBUG, this patch ought to cure that > too. Alternative to the 0 && (expr) could be sizeof (expr) or > something else where the expression isn't evaluated, but is parsed. I don't think this is allowed, as the standard explicitly says that the argument is ignored when NDEBUG is defined. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |